The U.S. market has rarely been this concentrated in a handful of AI names. Jason Zweig’s column points to an unglamorous hedge hiding in plain sight: Europe. Here’s the across-the-desk version.

The American stock market has rarely leaned on so few names. The AI complex — and the IPO pipeline behind it, from SpaceX to OpenAI to Anthropic — now drives an outsized share of index returns. When an index is that top-heavy, owning “the market” quietly means owning a concentrated bet on one theme. The S&P 500’s dividend yield has fallen to roughly 1.1%; you’re paying up and getting paid little to wait.
Jason Zweig’s argument is that European equities, largely shut out of the AI mania, trade at a meaningful discount to U.S. valuations and yield closer to 3%. For an investor who is nervous about a tech-stock bubble but doesn’t want to sit in cash, developed international markets are a way to stay invested while diversifying away from the most crowded trade on earth. Broad vehicles like a developed-markets index fund (VEA) or a total-international fund (VXUS) are the simple expression.
I agree with the destination, not necessarily the urgency. Europe is cheaper for reasons — slower growth, heavier regulation, less of the world’s best technology. The right move isn’t to dump U.S. quality and chase Europe because it’s down; it’s to hold a deliberate international sleeve as a permanent diversifier, sized on purpose, so you’re never all-in on one country or one theme.
We treat international exposure as a structural sleeve, not a tactical dash. A developed-markets position (VEA) and broad international (VXUS) sit in the book precisely so a U.S.-AI wobble doesn’t define the whole portfolio. Zweig’s column is a timely nudge to check that the sleeve is actually there — for a lot of DIY investors, it quietly isn’t.
Want to talk about where a theme like this does — and doesn’t — belong in your plan? Bring your statement; we translate the headline into a position-level decision.
Book Q2 Review →View Portfolios →