Owners have held Buddhist funerals for Sony’s robot dog. A sharp new essay argues that machines designed to be adorable are designed to lower your guard — and that’s a lesson that reaches well beyond the living room.

Sony (SONY) launched its robot dog, AIBO, back in 1999, discontinued it in 2006, then revived it in 2018 with modern AI. Along the way something strange happened: owners bonded with it so deeply that, when the early models broke down for good, some held Buddhist funerals for their “dead” robots. A new essay uses that fact to make a pointed argument — home robots are engineered to be cute precisely so we’ll form an emotional attachment to them.
Cuteness isn’t an accident; it’s a design choice that lowers your defenses. We extend trust to things we find adorable — we forgive them, we let them into our homes and our routines, we don’t scrutinize what they’re collecting or who’s behind them. The essay’s warning is that affection can be a back door: the more we love the cute machine, the less critically we judge it.
I bring this into a financial newsletter on purpose, because the exact same psychology runs through money. The charming advisor, the slick app with the celebrity spokesperson, the “can’t-lose” product wrapped in a warm story — they work by getting you to like them before you evaluate them. A good feeling is not due diligence. Whether it’s a robot or a financial product, the discipline is the same: enjoy the charm, then demand the evidence anyway.
The portfolio version of this rule is simple — we never let a story, a brand, or a good feeling substitute for the numbers. A pitch that leans on how much you’ll love it, rather than what it costs and what it returns, is a pitch to be careful with. Cute is fine. Cute plus unexamined is how people get sold things they shouldn’t own.
Want to talk about where a theme like this does — and doesn’t — belong in your plan? Bring your statement; we translate the headline into a position-level decision.
Book Q2 Review →View Portfolios →