Fidelity has been publishing a lifetime retirement-healthcare estimate for two decades. The methodology has been refined a dozen times. The current headline number for a 65-year-old couple retiring in 2024 is roughly $315,000 in lifetime out-of-pocket healthcare — premiums, copays, deductibles, uncovered costs — and it explicitly excludes long-term care. It assumes traditional Medicare with a supplement and Part D drug coverage. Substitute a Medicare Advantage plan with a hard out-of-pocket cap and the number shrinks. Add a chronic condition and the number explodes.
The reason this matters: nearly every retirement projection we see from outside platforms uses a healthcare-cost assumption in the $150,000–$175,000 range. That number was current around 2014. When a household models retirement with the older number, the plan looks adequately funded. When the same household uses Fidelity's current number, it often shows a five- to seven-year shortfall starting around age 78. The shortfall is real money. It is also exactly the age at which you are no longer in a position to go back to work.
You Are Likely To Live Longer Than The Average
The Society of Actuaries publishes the longevity tables most plans use. The average 65-year-old male has a life expectancy of 84; the average 65-year-old female, 87. Those are averages. The probability that at least one member of a 65-year-old couple lives past 92 is roughly 50%. Past 95, roughly 25%. Plans that end at 85 are planning for the median person. Plans that end at 95 are planning for one out of two couples. Which one is yours?
The Blue Zones Behaviors
The Blue Zones research — Sardinia, Okinawa, Loma Linda, Nicoya, Ikaria — converges on five behaviors that show up in every long-lived population: (1) movement built into daily life, not workouts (gardening, walking to errands); (2) eating to roughly 80% full; (3) a plant-forward diet with modest animal protein; (4) a social network you see weekly, not just at holidays; and (5) a stated purpose — Okinawans call it ikigai. None of those is expensive. All of them shift the longevity math.
For households where one spouse is sedentary and the other isn't, the Blue Zones literature is sobering. The longevity gap inside the household, holding everything else equal, can run 8–12 years. That gap is also the financial-planning gap. The surviving spouse will need the retirement income for a decade longer than the joint plan assumed. The annuity sleeve that looks too rich for the couple looks exactly right for the survivor.
Pull Your Current Retirement Projection
Find the healthcare-cost line and the terminal age. If healthcare is under $250,000 per couple, the model is using stale assumptions. If terminal age is under 92, the model is planning for the median person, not the realistic upside. We will rerun both with current Fidelity numbers and a 95-year terminal age at your Q2 review. Almost every plan we re-run this way reveals a five-year funding gap. That is what the annuity sleeve and the LTC rider were designed to close.