A bitcoin-hoarding company is paying 14% on a perpetual preferred it literally nicknamed “Stretch.” That number isn’t a reward for being smart — it’s the market screaming the risk at you. Here’s how to read the scream.

In today’s Heard on the Street, Spencer Jakab takes apart Michael Saylor’s Strategy (MSTR) — the company formerly known as MicroStrategy, now a giant pile of bitcoin wearing a stock ticker. To keep buying coins, Strategy sells a variable-rate perpetual preferred under the ticker STRC, which the company itself nicknamed “Stretch.” It has raised the coupon seven times, all the way to 11.5%, and pushed out more than $10 billion of the stuff in under a year.
Then the shares slid to $82.53, and because the dollar payout is fixed against a falling price, the effective yield popped to roughly 14%. Fourteen percent is junk-debt territory — the rate the market charges when it genuinely thinks it might not get paid back. And this is on a company that produces almost no cash of its own, whose market value is down about $90 billion since last July, and that has already crashed 99% once before under the same chairman.
Here is the part I want every client to internalize, and it has nothing to do with whether anybody here owns a single share of this thing. A yield that high is not a clever deal the crowd hasn’t noticed yet. It is a price. The market is quoting you, in plain numbers, exactly how nervous it is about getting its money back. Safe income does not pay 14%. When you see a number like that, the right reaction isn’t “where do I sign” — it’s “what does the market know that the brochure isn’t telling me.”
And the brochure is always lovely. You have seen the ads: “live off the dividend,” a smiling retiree on an exotic beach, passive income forever. What that picture rarely says is where the cash actually comes from. When a company generates almost nothing on its own, the new coupon checks are often funded by the next round of new investors handing over fresh money — old investors paid with new investors’ cash. That is the structure of every story that eventually ends in a courtroom, and the high yield is the lure that makes it spread.
This matters for our households specifically because the “passive income” pitch is aimed squarely at retirees. You have a nest egg, you need it to throw off a check, and a number like 14% does the math you wish were true: suddenly the portfolio “works” and you never touch principal. That is precisely why the reach-for-yield products get marketed to your inbox and your Facebook feed, not to a 28-year-old with a 401(k). The people who can least afford a permanent loss are the people the high coupon is engineered to attract.
Our income does not come from instruments like this, and that is a deliberate choice. The cash a client lives on is generated by diversified, profitable businesses that actually earn the money they pay out — dividend payers across consumer staples, healthcare, energy and financials, plus high-quality bonds — companies whose distributions come out of real earnings, not out of the next buyer’s deposit.
A sustainable yield looks boring on purpose: a 3% to 5% stream backed by free cash flow and a long history of getting paid, not a 14% headline backed by a hope and a rising-price assumption. If a product’s yield is two or three times what a quality dividend portfolio pays, that gap isn’t free money — it is the exact amount of extra risk you are being asked to swallow. We would rather you keep your principal and sleep at night than chase a coupon the market has already labeled as junk.
The themes above connect to a few specific planning topics — start here, or book a 15-minute review.
Got a “passive income” pitch in your feed and want a second set of eyes before you bite? Bring it. We’ll read the yield the way the market does and show you what a sustainable income stream actually looks like.
Book Q2 Review →View Portfolios →