Capital Wealth
FRI CLOSE · SEP 18   S&P 500 7,650.50 ▲0.17%  ·  DJIA 51,682.64 ▼0.18%  ·  NASDAQ 26,522.55 ▲0.39%  ·  10-YR 4.995%  ·  2-YR 4.741%  ·  WTI $100.30 ▼1.6%  ·  GOLD $4,385.90 ▲0.6%  ·  VIX 14.81 ▼4.1%
Review · Family · Behavioral

A Boston College Psychologist Says Phones Didn’t Break Childhood. School Did. Either Way, Let Them Outside.

Two eminent psychologists agree that something broke in American childhood around 2010 and disagree about what. The argument is worth having. The prescription they share — less scheduling, more independence, more chores — is worth following regardless.

By Sean Anees Saifi · Capital Wealth · Published Saturday, September 19, 2026 · Source: The Wall Street Journal, September 19–20, 2026 weekend edition, whose market figures are the Friday, September 18 close
Key Points
44% → 83%
students calling school a major stressor, 2009 to 2013
2010
both the iPhone wave and the Common Core rollout
82
Gray’s age; the textbook is in its eighth edition
0
population-level link the 2024 National Academies study found
An empty school playground at dawn with a swing set and hopscotch markings on cracked asphalt, trees behind a chain-link fence.
“When I was a kid, 5-year-olds regularly walked to kindergarten.” Gray’s prescription is the one both sides of the argument share: let them out.
In one line: Two experts disagree about the cause and agree about the cure, which is the same pattern as most financial debates: argue about the forecast, act on the habits.

Peter Gray thinks smartphones for kids are just fine, thank you very much. He is 82, a research professor of psychology at Boston College, the author of a textbook now in its eighth edition, and the person Jonathan Haidt’s bestseller “The Anxious Generation” was, in a sense, written at. “I read some of his research and I said, ‘Jon, these are not that convincing.’”

Both men agree that something changed for the worse in American childhood around 2010. Haidt says it was the iPhone. Gray, in his new book “Restoring Childhood,” says it was the Common Core curriculum, rolled out in most states the same year. His exhibit: a 2009 American Psychological Association survey in which 44% of students reported worrying about doing well in school, and a 2013 survey in which 83% called school a significant source of stress. When you ask teenagers what makes them anxious, he says, school comes out on top, then college admissions, then jobs. He also cites a 2024 National Academies consensus study that “did not support the conclusion that social media causes changes in adolescent health at the population level.”

Where they agree

Gray is not a libertarian about screens. No phones at the dinner table. Places where kids are physically present and outdoors. Certain pornography and online gambling should be illegal for everyone, he says, not just for children. Where he breaks with the current movement is on play: videogames, by every definition, are play — creative, autonomous, social — and he notes that the 1990s moral panic about them coincided with falling teenage violence and, among kids with computer access, improving mental health.

The deeper argument is about freedom. The restraint of children outdoors began around 1980 with a few horrific stranger abductions, “which generated a wild panic that we are still in the throes of today.” A Virginia mother was recently convicted of contributing to the delinquency of a minor for letting her 5-year-old walk to a pond in a gated community. “It’s not that the world has become more dangerous. It’s our perception of the danger.” His parenting model — trustful, autonomy-supportive — is chores, no doing their homework, kids cooking dinner. “It frees you up.”

Our read

We include this in a financial paper for two reasons. The first is that the pattern is one we see every day: two credentialed experts arguing hard about the cause while agreeing almost entirely about what to do. Investors do this constantly — a fierce debate about whether the Fed or the deficit or Japan is pushing the 10-year to 5%, while everyone in the room would give the same advice about how long your bonds should be. Argue about the forecast if you enjoy it. Act on the habits, because the habits are what both sides recommend.

The second reason is that Gray’s prescription is a money prescription in disguise. Chores, a kid cooking dinner, a 5-year-old walking to school — these are how competence gets built, and financial competence is built the same way: an allowance with real consequences, a teenager’s first Roth funded from a summer job, a college student handed the budget rather than the card. The children Gray describes as over-scheduled and over-protected become the 25-year-olds we meet who have never made a financial decision alone. The fix starts earlier than 25.

What It Means For Your Portfolio

Hold — argue about the cause; act on the habits

Two experts disagree about what broke childhood and agree about the cure. Most financial arguments have the same shape: argue about the forecast, act on the habits both sides share.

General planning principles, not advice for anyone in particular. The habits both psychologists endorse have direct financial versions: an allowance with consequences, a teenager’s Roth IRA funded from a summer job, a college student given the budget rather than the card. Competence is built by being trusted with something real.

The desk’s version of “argue about the cause, act on the habits” is the September letter: a debate about the timing of a drop, and a written set of actions that are the same whether the drop comes in October or never.

Book a 15-Minute Review → Back to Edition No. 174 →