Here are the principles, the contract measured against each one, and the record behind the buffer. The ruling belongs to your scholar.
Clients who invest by their faith keep asking me the same question about annuities: can a contract protect principal without breaking the rules they live by? It deserves a straight answer. The facts of the contract are mine to get right; the ruling is their scholar’s.
Capital Wealth · Principal first
The company takes the first slice of an index loss and you take the rest. No rate is promised in advance.

Your principal is guaranteed; a profit is not. Many scholars question any guarantee on capital.

A declared 3% on money handed over is interest by any definition.

Own it? Only the screened part, in the book. Be paid by it? Scholars differ, and section 04 lays out the question.
“Allah has permitted trade and forbidden interest.”The Quran, 2:275
Trade, not interest
A buffer is a seawall · it takes the first sliceThe company absorbs the first 10% or 20% of an index loss. You take what is left.
No loss from the index. The gain is capped: 42% over six years, 60% with the rider.
One, two or six years. The money is committed for six, with 10% a year free to take out.
You own no shares and receive no dividend; the credit is a formula on the index level. Every segment and rate is on the calculator →

No. The credit is whatever the index did, and it can be zero.
No
On a buffer, yes: the company takes the first slice and you take the rest.
On a buffer
The money is committed for years and credited on the whole economy. Nothing to watch.
Held, not traded
Not by you. No fixed segment, and any credit labelled interest goes to charity.
Excluded
No. The S&P 500 holds banks, brewers and casinos. Two answers in section 04.
Ask your scholar
2.5% of the contract value on your valuation date, run with the book.
Handled
The whole market · and the part that passes“Can we invest in the S&P 500?” is two questions wearing one name. Owning it is one. Being paid by it, inside the contract, is the other.
Under the standard screen, the one this firm publishes on its faith-based investing page, a company fails if more than 5% of its revenue is impermissible or its debt tops a third of its market value. On that screen the S&P 500 fails as a whole: conventional financials alone are about 12% of the index by weight, and roughly 300 of the 500 companies fail on activity or leverage. About 220 pass, and S&P publishes them as the S&P 500 Shariah; the SPUS fund tracks it. To own the market screened, that is the book: SPUS and single names checked on Musaffa and Zoya, with purification of the small interest income the funds report.
Screened book insteadInside the RILA the S&P 500 is a yardstick. You own no share of any bank, no dividend from a brewer reaches you, and the credit is an agreement with the insurer whose outcome follows a number: no promised rate, a loss shared on a buffer segment, held for years rather than traded. Scholars differ on a contract referenced to an unscreened index. Some hold that a gain measured by impermissible companies carries their taint and must be purified or avoided. Others hold that an agreement whose outcome merely follows a number is not ownership of what the number contains. No carrier offers a screened index on a RILA today. Ask your scholar the precise question, an index-linked credit with no ownership, no dividend and the loss shared, and if the answer is yes with purification, we compute the share from the index’s non-compliant weight and it goes to charity.
Ask your scholarMeanwhile: the growth sleeve is the screened book, the RILA is only the principal sleeve, index segments only, and the open question sits in your file in your own words.
Principal firstTwo costs that are not faith questions: the credit is price return, about two points a year behind the dividends, and the money is committed for six years.
Sized by the date, not the fearWe will not call a product permissible. That belongs to your scholar and to your conscience.
Scholars differ on insurance and annuity contracts, and many hold conventional insurance impermissible and point to takaful instead. This letter lays the contract against each principle so the question can be asked precisely. Bring the answer to your review; it goes in the file next to the plan.
Your callIf you want to walk through it with your own numbers, bring your statement and your scholar’s question to the review. We will size the sleeve by the date, not the fear.
— Sean
Sean Anees Saifi · Capital Wealth
Capital Wealth LG is an independent investment advisory practice. This page is education for a planning conversation, not a recommendation to buy any security or contract and not a religious ruling; questions of permissibility belong to the client’s scholar. A registered index-linked annuity is a long-term contract issued by an insurance company: caps and participation rates limit the gain, buffers provide limited protection, withdrawal charges apply during the six-year period, credits are based on index price return without dividends, and guarantees rest on the claims-paying ability of the issuing insurer. Rates are from the carrier’s sheet dated 06/15/2026 and change; the rate in force is the one on the application date. Historical periods are shown for illustration; the product did not exist in them, and past performance does not guarantee future results.