Capital Wealth
WED CLOSE · SEP 30   S&P 500 7,651.54 ▼0.25%  ·  DJIA 50,906.05 ▼0.86%  ·  NASDAQ 26,861.06 ▲0.24%  ·  10-YR 5.29%  ·  2-YR 4.88%  ·  WTI $90.42 ▲1.2%  ·  GOLD $4,186.70 ▲0.2%  ·  VIX 16.34 ▲1.9%
Personal Journal · Work & Family · M5

Call It a Check-In. Don’t Call It a Review. Gen Z Still Doesn’t Know What’s Expected

The oldest Gen Z workers are turning 30. Companies are hiring consultants and bots to tell managers how to talk to them. Knowing the job still dropped to 42%.

By Sean Anees Saifi · Capital Wealth · Published Thursday, October 1, 2026 · Source: The Wall Street Journal, Wednesday, September 30, 2026 edition, whose market figures are the Tuesday, September 29 close (Personal Journal)
Key Points
42%
Gen Z / younger millennials who strongly know what’s expected
−9 pts
drop on that Gallup item, 2020 to 2025
30
age the oldest Gen Z workers are about to hit
Quarterly
two-way check-ins replacing the annual review at some firms
An office at night, one desk lamp on over an empty meeting table.
Rename the meeting all you like — the job still needs to be written down.
In one line: Companies are rebranding reviews as check-ins. The share of young workers who know what’s expected still fell 9 points, to 42%.

Bosses are drowning in instructions on how to talk to the youngest people on payroll. Do ask how they are. Don’t attack a personality trait. Do give concrete direction, a lot of it. And whatever you do, call it a check-in, not a review. The oldest Gen Z workers are about to turn 30. Gallup’s item that actually matters still got worse: the share of Gen Z and younger millennials who strongly agreed they know what is expected at work fell 9 points, to 42%, from 2020 to 2025.

Adam Coyne, 55, who runs administration at research firm Mathematica, got one review a year into his first job and that was the deal. His shop now runs quarterly, two-way check-ins for new junior hires. This group wants real-time feedback, he told the Journal — the same message coming out of all-hands surveys and college career offices. Managers point at likes and instant grades. Some of the 20-somethings would like the managers to stop. Nathan Luckock, a 20-year-old engineer at an AI startup, said he personally dislikes the effusive style. More useful, in his words: pointing out mistakes and then offering a solution.

A renamed meeting is not a job description

Consultants and AI bots now sell the script for a generation that reports some of the largest engagement drops in five years. That is a management product. It is also a household cash-flow product. If you don’t know what good looks like, you don’t know whether the 3.5% midpoint raise in the Marsh survey belongs to you or to the person the model already marked as underpaid. Ambiguity is how people stay at the bottom of the range.

Our read

Cash Flow (M5) / Behavioral: ask for the scorecard in writing — the three things that count this quarter — whether they call it a check-in or a review. A career that only makes sense if a manager gets you is a single-name position. Keep skills and cash that still work if the feedback culture is a mess. The Grant interview in this edition is the other half: agility beats a title that nobody will define.

If you manage people, the expensive version is a consultant. The cheap version is a one-page list of what done looks like, delivered more than once a year. Fifteen minutes. You don’t wait for engagement to collapse to write down the job.

What It Means For Your Portfolio

Hold — get the scorecard in writing; a renamed review is not a plan

Young workers who strongly know what’s expected fell 9 points, to 42%. Companies renamed the meeting. The job description is still the missing page.

General planning principles, not advice for anyone in particular. A check-in that never writes down what good looks like cannot support a raise, a job switch, or a household budget. Ask for the three items that count this quarter, in writing, whatever they call the meeting.

If you manage people, the cheap version of the consultant is a one-page definition of done, more than once a year. Ambiguity is how someone stays at the bottom of the 3.5% range.

Book a 15-Minute Review → Back to Edition No. 178 →