Capital Wealth
FRI CLOSE · OCT 2   S&P 500 7,722.72 ▲0.73%  ·  DJIA 51,176.96 ▲0.49%  ·  NASDAQ 27,190.86 ▲1.19%  ·  10-YR 5.28%  ·  2-YR 4.82%  ·  WTI $91.11 ▼1.9%  ·  GOLD $4,133.70 ▼0.9%  ·  VIX 15.31 ▼6.6%
Mansion · Historic Homes · M6 · Estate

A GM Executive’s 1923 Cow-Farm House Lists for $3.5 Million — With a Preservation Easement That Travels With the Deed

Prize Jersey cows, a Kelvinator in the kitchen, a rewired servants’ call box — and a 2012 easement that bars teardown or development. An easement is a decision every later owner lives with; price it like one.

By Sean Anees Saifi · Capital Wealth · Published Sunday, October 4, 2026 · Source: The Wall Street Journal, Friday, October 2, 2026, whose market figures are the Thursday, October 1 close (Mansion)
Key Points
$3.5 million
Asking price for the circa-1923 Ann Arbor house
$671,000
What the Bunds paid in 1985 for the house on 5 acres
$300,000
Cost of their one-year restoration, at the time
600
Acres in Goss’s Oaklands dairy estate in the 1920s
A large white clapboard farmhouse with a stone chimney and a columned porch on a lawn framed by autumn oaks.
Under the 1960s aluminum siding the Bunds found cypress clapboard; a 2012 easement now protects the house from demolition or development.
In one line: A historic Ann Arbor house bought for $671,000 lists at $3.5 million with a preservation easement attached — a permanent choice that shapes its value and buyers, and a sell-or-hold estate question for owners in their 80s.

Sometime in the early 1990s, about two dozen Ann Arbor, Mich., neighbors gathered in Sally Bund’s living room for a slide show, and the subject was the ground under their own houses. It had been Oaklands, a 600-acre estate where Arnold Goss, a General Motors (GM) vice president, raised blue-ribbon Jersey cows and supplied Just Jerseys dairy to the neighbors. Goss also helped found Kelvinator, so, naturally, there was a Kelvinator in the kitchen. The main house, circa 1923, is now listed at $3.5 million, Sarah Paynter reports in Friday’s Mansion section.

The farm ended when Goss died in 1938. Gertrude stayed until her death in 1973, the family sold off land, and in 1985 a developer bought the house and cut the last roughly 40 acres into lots. That same year Sally, a preservationist, and Ian Bund, a venture capitalist, paid $671,000 for the house on 5 acres and spent $300,000 over about a year putting it right: peeling off 1960s aluminum siding to find cypress clapboard, restoring the columns, chimneys and stone walkways, eventually rewiring the servants’ call box. In 2012 they put a preservation easement on it that bars future demolition, alteration or development. Sally’s reasoning was blunt — sell it unprotected and “there could be six new homes built.”

Downsizing in their 80s

Both Bunds are now in their 80s, and they’re trading down without leaving town. Their listing agent, Matt Dejanovich of Real Estate One, figures the right buyer will pay a premium for the pedigree. For scale, Redfin puts the city’s median sale at about $475,000 for the three months before September, roughly flat on the year.

Our read

Housing (M6) with an Estate chapter. A preservation easement is about as permanent as a planning decision gets. It’s recorded against the property, usually held by a preservation nonprofit or public agency, and it typically binds every owner who comes after you. It takes the development value off the table — no six lots, no teardown — and narrows the buyers to people who want this house as it is. That may be exactly the buyer who pays up for pedigree, as Dejanovich hopes; it can also mean a longer wait. A donated easement may qualify for a charitable deduction, but those deductions draw close IRS scrutiny and need a qualified appraisal, so they’re a bonus, not the reason to do it.

Then the estate question. The $671,000 purchase plus the $300,000 restoration comes to a bit under $1 million, against a $3.5 million ask: four decades of gain. On a primary home, the federal home-sale exclusion can shelter only part of a gain that size, since it’s capped, and under current law, property held until death generally gets a stepped-up basis for heirs. So for owners in their 80s, selling versus holding is partly a tax call — only partly. Upkeep, liquidity, care costs and simply wanting a smaller life count too, and Ian Bund’s standard for the place (“it’s got to be done right”) doesn’t get lighter with age. Run both paths with your estate attorney and tax preparer before the sign goes up; an umbrella’s cheapest on a dry day.

What It Means For Your Portfolio

Hold — run the sell-or-hold math before listing

No portfolio action — for owners in their 80s with a large, long-held gain, selling now versus holding for a stepped-up basis is a genuine estate-planning decision, and an easement is one that travels with the deed.

General planning principles, not advice for anyone in particular. Before placing a preservation or conservation easement, get the property appraised with and without it, understand who will hold and enforce it, and ask how it changes your buyer pool and your heirs’ options. Treat any charitable deduction as a bonus that has to survive scrutiny.

If you’re older and sitting on a large gain in a long-held home, model two paths with your tax and estate advisers: sell now and use the home-sale exclusion, which is capped, or hold and let heirs inherit with a stepped-up basis under current law. Upkeep, liquidity and where you want to live should weigh as much as the tax line.

Book a 15-Minute Review → Back to Edition No. 179 →