Capital Wealth
FRI CLOSE · SEP 25   S&P 500 7,743.41 ▲0.51%  ·  DJIA 51,828.62 ▲0.93%  ·  NASDAQ 27,068.72 ▲0.48%  ·  10-YR 5.17%  ·  2-YR 4.81%  ·  WTI $92.44 ▼2.3%  ·  GOLD $4,320.50 ▲0.5%  ·  VIX 14.87 ▼5.1%
Page One · College Costs · M5

Some Private Colleges Are Cutting Sticker Tuition by 40% or More. At Coe, Nobody Was Paying It Anyway

A $10,000 scholarship used to look better than a $10,000-lower price. Now some colleges are betting families would rather see a number closer to what they’d pay.

By Sean Anees Saifi · Capital Wealth · Published Sunday, September 27, 2026 · Source: The Wall Street Journal, September 26–27, 2026 weekend edition, whose market figures are the Friday, September 25 close (Page One)
Key Points
$26,800
Carroll College’s new tuition and fees, down from $44,712
~45%
Coe College’s cut, to $31,850, starting next fall
$40,000+
average aid per Coe student in 2023-24; none paid full price
6.5%
rise in Pell share after big sticker cuts, per one study
Students working on laptops in a bright classroom overlooking the water, a chart on the wall screen.
At $26,800, Carroll College stops being Montana’s most expensive school on paper. Its president calls the new number closer to reality.
In one line: The sticker was a marketing number and the aid letter was the real one; some colleges are starting to print a number closer to it, and families should plan to the real one either way.

Every business owner knows the number on the sign isn’t the number at the register. College families are finding out. Coe College in Iowa lists tuition at $58,780 this year; in 2023-24, per the latest federal data, not one Coe student paid full price, and average aid per student topped $40,000. Next fall the school cuts the sticker by about 45%, to $31,850 — and it has company. More private colleges are taking a hard look at their price, the weekend Journal reports on Page One — some lopping 40% or more off tuition, some offering in-state-style prices to rival the publics, some promising certain families no loans.

Carroll College in Montana is the poster child. It announced a 40% cut starting fall 2027, and President Jennifer Glowienka calls the moment a sea change. For years the school argued over its model — big sticker, big discounts — and came to see the cost: applicants who took one look at the price and never applied, so never saw the aid they’d have gotten. The school settled on $26,800 a year in tuition and fees, down from $44,712 — closer to reality, Glowienka says, and in line with out-of-state tuition at public universities. Go much lower, says Erik Rose, its associate vice president of enrollment, and it starts to squeeze the aid it can offer for merit and athletics.

Why the sticker got so high

Because for years, families read price as quality. Knock $10,000 off the sticker and you looked cheap; hand out $10,000 scholarships instead and you looked generous — and students felt they’d won something, Urban Institute economist Sandy Baum tells the paper. Brett Schraeder of the consultant EAB calls it a tug of war — a lower price, or a higher one dressed in merit money. The skeptics have data: S&P Global Ratings, the S&P Global (SPGI) unit, found a price change can tip an individual student’s choice but shows no broad link to higher enrollment, and a study in the Review of Higher Education found notable sticker cuts brought a 6.5% rise in the share of Pell Grant recipients.

Other schools attack the same fear differently. Marist University in the Hudson Valley has capped the yearly bill — tuition, housing and dining — at $32,000 for New Yorkers whose families earn under $200,000, starting in 2027. Union College is offering virtually every New Yorker a $30,000-a-year scholarship. And Carleton College in Minnesota will take loans out of its aid packages from fall 2027 — as the Ivies, Amherst and Williams already have — and President Alison Byerly had to show older donors the research on how debt scares applicants away. Of prospective students, she said: “They don’t wait to get the financial-aid package. They just walk away.”

Our read

Byerly’s sentence is the whole planning lesson (M5, education funding). The mistake isn’t paying too much; it’s deciding on a number you might never have been asked to pay. The figure to plan around is the net price — what’s left after grants and scholarships — and it’s only certain once the aid letter arrives. So don’t cross a school off for its sticker, and don’t fall for a lower one either: as Carroll’s Rose says, a lower list price leaves less room for merit awards.

Business owners will recognize the model — list price, deep discount, realized price — and know only the last one is real. Size the 529 and the monthly saving (M3) to a realistic net price, not the sticker, and revisit it when the first aid letters land. If a college bill sits inside your next ten years, spend fifteen minutes with your statement and a net-price estimate before the campus tour does your deciding for you.

What It Means For Your Portfolio

Hold — plan to the net price, not the sticker

No portfolio action — the number that matters is the net price after aid, and the sticker often isn’t it; plan the college fund to the real number and don’t walk away before the aid letter.

General planning principles, not advice for anyone in particular. Compare colleges on net price — sticker minus grants and scholarships — never on the published number, and don’t rule a school out before its aid offer arrives. A lower sticker can come with smaller merit awards, so the family’s check may not change at all.

Size college savings to a realistic net price and a realistic timeline, then re-check both each year against actual aid letters. Loan-free pledges come with cutoffs that vary by school, so read the fine print before counting on one.

Book a 15-Minute Review → Back to Edition No. 177 →