Capital Wealth
TUE CLOSE · OCT 6   S&P 500 7,818.93 ▲0.58%  ·  DJIA 51,521.28 ▲0.49%  ·  NASDAQ 27,599.79 ▲0.45%  ·  10-YR 5.27%  ·  2-YR 4.79%  ·  WTI $89.44 ▲0.01%  ·  GOLD $4,159.20 ▲0.75%  ·  VIX 15.01 ▼3.3%
Heard on the Street · Index Funds · IN04

Your Index Fund Went Up — Was It What’s on the Label? GameStop, Super Micro and a 23-Million-Person Taiwan Say Check

Around 2,000 index ETFs promise you the exact basket on the label. Three times in five years the basket quietly became something else — and the gains that followed weren’t the idea you bought.

By Sean Anees Saifi · Capital Wealth · Published Wednesday, October 7, 2026 · Source: The Wall Street Journal, Tuesday, October 6, 2026, whose market figures are the Monday, October 5 close (Heard on the Street)
Key Points
2,000
Index ETFs now available, roughly, per Jakab
23 million
Taiwan’s population; it outweighs five big EM countries combined in MSCI’s index
24.8%
EEM (MSCI emerging markets) year to date, Wednesday’s table
12.8%
VWO (FTSE emerging markets) year to date, same table
A row of clear glass jars with blank brown paper labels, each filled with different beans or grains, lines a wooden pantry shelf, while one open jar of grain sits forward on the counter in warm window light.
Two funds called ‘emerging markets’ are a dozen points apart this year because their index makers disagree on whether South Korea counts.
In one line: Index funds deliver the benchmark, but the benchmark changes under you — meme stocks, misfiled giants and a Taiwan-heavy EM index have each turned ‘the label’ into something else, so check what your funds actually own before crediting your judgment.

Here’s a humbling exercise. Pull up the fund that made you feel smart this year and ask: did it go up because of the thing on the label, or because of something that wandered into the basket? Spencer Jakab, in Tuesday’s Heard on the Street, has three answers from the past five years, and none of them flatters the buyer.

Early 2021 is the first. Value had been the market’s laggard for years, small-cap value most of all, and the investors who finally bought a Russell 2000 Value fund were rewarded with a quarter that trounced the S&P 500. Not because value turned — that came about a year later — but because the meme frenzy had briefly made GameStop (GME) and AMC Entertainment (AMC), two companies losing money, the biggest holdings in an index built for cheap, unglamorous stocks. You bought discipline and got a message board.

Round two came three years later, and this time the whole Russell 2000 benefited. Strategy (MSTR), the bitcoin-hoarding former MicroStrategy, and Super Micro Computer (SMCI) had ballooned far beyond anything resembling a small cap, but Russell rebalanced its indexes only once a year, in late June, so both stayed put. Between them they supplied one-third of the Russell 2000’s first-quarter gain in 2024 — and were dropped from the index about the time the run ended. And this spring, anyone buying emerging markets to get away from AI got a double helping of it: Taiwan, home to 23 million people, outweighs Turkey, Mexico, Brazil, India and South Africa put together in MSCI’s index, South Korea is a close second, and in May three chip makers — TSMC (TSM), Samsung and SK Hynix — contributed more to the index’s gain than its roughly 1,100 other stocks.

Two ‘emerging markets’ funds, a dozen points apart

You can see the label problem in Wednesday’s ETF table. The iShares MSCI Emerging Markets fund (EEM) is up 24.8% this year; Vanguard’s FTSE Emerging Markets fund (VWO) is up 12.8%. Same words on the tin, a dozen points of daylight, largely because the two index providers disagree about whether South Korea is still emerging. Jakab’s verdict, which we’ll borrow: buy cheap index funds to diversify, “but keep your day job.”

Our read

Investments/Risk (IN04). The lesson isn’t that indexing is broken; it’s that an index is a recipe someone else writes and occasionally rewrites, and your job is to know what’s in the pot. The house owns these recipes with its eyes open — VWO in 9 model books, Korea’s EWY in 17, Taiwan Semiconductor itself in 30 — held at weight, nothing added, and we keep the equal-weight S&P 500 (RSP, 2 books) around as the honest scoreboard: it’s up 10.8% this year against 14.2% for the cap-weighted SPY, which tells you how much of 2026 is a handful of names.

So open the fund’s holdings page, not just its factsheet. Count how many of your ‘different’ funds own the same ten stocks; find out whether your EM fund is really a bet on Asian chips (it probably is); and when a fund jumps for reasons you can’t name, treat the gain as luck until proven otherwise — luck is for banking, not for extrapolating. Fifteen minutes with the overlap is the cheapest diligence in investing, and it’s the kind you do before the weather turns, not after.

What It Means For Your Portfolio

Hold — read the holdings page, not the label

No portfolio action: keep the cheap index funds, but know that their returns can come from stocks that don’t match the name — check overlap and what’s really driving a gain before you give yourself credit for it.

General planning principles, not advice for anyone in particular. Once a year, list the top ten holdings of every fund you own and look for repeats; a ‘value’, a ‘small-cap’ and an ‘emerging’ fund can all be riding the same theme. If one fund has run far ahead of its peers, find out which stocks did it before deciding it was skill.

Prefer funds whose index rules you can explain in a sentence — how often it reconstitutes, how it caps a single stock, which countries it includes. The less you can explain, the less of your money it should hold.

Book a 15-Minute Review → Back to Edition No. 180 →