Theo Francis opens his piece in Tuesday’s Journal with a line that could serve as an epitaph for a certain kind of board: “Special executive payouts aren’t so special anymore.” He’s got the data. S&P 500 companies handed out $1.7 billion in one-time awards last year, up 50% from the year before, according to a Journal analysis of Equilar figures. Nearly half the index has made at least one such award in the past two years; a quarter have made more than one. Some executives — Warner Bros. Discovery’s (WBD) David Zaslav, Cisco’s (CSCO) Chuck Robbins — got them back to back, which rather strains the word special.
The awards do a lot of lifting. Median S&P 500 CEO pay reached $17.9 million last year, from $11 million a decade earlier, and Equilar’s Courtney Yu says the names at the top of the list tend to get there on a one-time grant in a given year. Boards cite turnover: 67 S&P 500 leaders left in 2025, up 29% from 2023, and 36 more departed in the first half of this year. Pay consultant Blair Jones summed up the boardroom mood — “They’re feeling the heat and they’re feeling the urgency.” Investors see it differently. T. Rowe Price’s proxy-voting guidelines file special equity awards under pay practices it regards as outdated or likely to pull executives’ interests away from shareholders’, and ISS says it heard “loud and clear” that one-offs shouldn’t become a pattern.
Three case files
Zaslav’s $165 million for last year made him the fifth-highest-paid CEO in the Journal’s ranking; $110 million of it was a June 2025 option grant for signing a new contract, on top of $29 million in salary and bonus. He’s collected about $111 million so far and is in line for the remaining roughly $366 million when Paramount Skydance (PSKY) closes its acquisition next week — Warner’s stock has tripled since March 2025. CrowdStrike (CRWD) gave co-founder George Kurtz a $188 million special award in late December that could reach $290 million at that valuation if shareholder-return hurdles are met through 2028, or nothing if they aren’t; the shares have more than doubled since. And Nike (NKE) paid $35 million in special awards to five executives, including $4.1 million to then-CFO Matthew Friend, who also had a $3.3 million retention award from the prior year. He left in September with $6 million in cash severance and, by the Journal’s reckoning, keeps some $1.2 million of the retention shares for having stayed long enough. The elephant, excluded from the totals: Elon Musk’s $132 billion Tesla (TSLA) award in November.
Our read
This is an Investments/Risk (IN04) story for anyone who owns individual stocks, with a Career footnote. The shareholder problem with one-offs isn’t the size; it’s that they sit outside the long-term plan that’s supposed to pay nothing when performance is poor. A board that grants a special award every year has quietly built a second pay plan with no downside. Where it shows isn’t the headline pay figure but the proxy — the footnotes to the compensation table and the grants section, where the words special, supplemental, retention and one-time do the work. Of the names here, CrowdStrike is held in 20 books, Tesla in 13, Nike in 1 and Cisco in 2, all at weight; nothing added or sold on a pay story. Warner Bros. Discovery isn’t owned. A pay plan is a governance input, not a trading signal.
The Career footnote is Friend’s. If you’re ever offered a retention award, read the vesting schedule and the leaver terms before you read the number — Nike’s CFO kept about $1.2 million by staying past a vesting date, and half his award hung on a $100 share price that never held. The same discipline applies to your own equity comp, and most people never look. Bring the grant agreement to the next review; the time to know what you’d walk away from is before anyone asks you to.
