Capital Wealth
FRI CLOSE · SEP 25   S&P 500 7,743.41 ▲0.51%  ·  DJIA 51,828.62 ▲0.93%  ·  NASDAQ 27,068.72 ▲0.48%  ·  10-YR 5.17%  ·  2-YR 4.81%  ·  WTI $92.44 ▼2.3%  ·  GOLD $4,320.50 ▲0.5%  ·  VIX 14.87 ▼5.1%
Off Duty · The Uncanny Valley · M11

Restaurants Let AI Shoot the Menu. The Shrimp Came Out Looking Like Life Preservers

Image generators have mostly stopped drawing six-fingered hands, but lunch can still trip them up: diners are recoiling at glossy noodles, dinosaur-skin chicken and shrimp shaped like life preservers. One cafe’s AI sign came down after a pile-on and graffiti; a Brooklyn diner swears by the tools.

By Sean Anees Saifi · Capital Wealth · Published Friday, September 25, 2026 · Source: The Wall Street Journal, Friday, September 25, 2026 edition, whose market figures are the Thursday, September 24 close
Key Points
6 fingers
the old AI tell that image generators have mostly outgrown
3 hands
on the bartender in one Brooklyn diner’s AI videos
1 sign
taken down by a San Francisco cafe after the backlash
100
iffy AI uses per few good ones, as one passerby sees it
A glowing menu screen of unnaturally shiny wings and shrimp in a dark food-truck window, fries on the counter below.
Image generators have mostly stopped giving people six fingers. The shrimp are another matter.
In one line: A picture is a promise, and when it looks synthetic, diners notice and push back — and as the fakes improve, checking the real thing beats eyeballing the photo.

Janely Montgomery just wanted lunch. At a carnival near Buffalo, N.Y., she wandered up to a halal truck, and the pictures on its side gave her a full Twilight Zone moment: she knew every dish by name, and every image was a little off. The shawarma looked like a tortilla rolled around chickpeas and stamped all over with circles. “It just looks like what I assume an alien would think that we eat,” she told the Journal. No aliens were involved; an image generator was.

Restaurants reach for AI pictures as a stopgap while commissioned photos are pending, or as a cheaper substitute for professional marketing, and they’re appearing on everything from to-go menus to deli cases. They do get noticed — just not in the appetizing way. Social media is passing around salads of unnatural symmetry, noodles with a lacquered gleam, shrimp shaped like life preservers and chicken wearing dinosaur hide; one poster on X decided a plate of wings had been fished out of a reactor core. In Washington, a 36-year-old paralegal ticked off the tells: fries that repeat like wallpaper, bread with more texture than bread has any right to.

Why does this keep happening? Jory Schossau, an AI researcher, says the generators are pattern predictors: when a dish’s nuance escapes them, they fall back on rules of thumb — cooked shrimp are roughly round, with bands — and out come shrimp that look like rubber rings from another planet. Sometimes they repeat a texture so perfectly it sets off trypophobia, the skin-crawl some people get from clusters of holes. Here’s the odd part: better tools exist. Schossau asked Google’s (GOOGL) Nano Banana for mac-n-cheese and shrimp scampi and got believable results, and he suspects many of the viral horrors came from older models.

The sign came down

It can backfire fast. Lyndsey Lozano opened a San Francisco cafe with her husband this year and used AI ads for its sandwiches and iced drinks; the internet shredded them, someone vandalized the storefront with graffiti, and the sign came down — in a city she calls tech-forward, no less. Across the country, Jordan Beau of Daisy’s Diner & Bar in Brooklyn isn’t apologizing: AI, he says, stretches his marketing budget and pulls in younger customers. His ads start from photos of real food, even if his TikToks feature ube pancakes under a purple sauce that seems to pulse and a bartender with three hands.

Our read

A menu photo is a promise, and the uncanny ones break it in public — ask the San Francisco cafe whose sign came down. That’s the consumer-protection lesson hiding in the shrimp (M11). The glowing wings are the easy fakes; Schossau’s test suggests newer tools already make believable food, which means the fakes that cost people money may not look radioactive at all — the rental listing, the car for sale, the contractor’s past work. So don’t grade the photo; verify the thing before money moves — see it, call a number you looked up yourself, and never wire a deposit on the strength of a picture.

Investing has its own menu photos: the glossy brochure, the pitch deck, the chart that only goes up. The holdings list and the fee table are the food. Taste those first.

What It Means For Your Portfolio

Hold — trust the plate, not the picture

No portfolio action — the lesson is consumer protection: the fakes that cost people money are the ones that look real, so verifying the thing itself has to replace judging the picture.

General planning principles, not advice for anyone in particular. Treat any image attached to a request for money — a rental, a used car, a contractor’s portfolio — as marketing until you’ve verified the thing itself. Pay deposits through channels that allow disputes, and call back on numbers you found independently.

For investments, the menu photo is the brochure and the pitch deck. The holdings, the fee table and the prospectus are the food; reading them takes an evening, and they tell you what the photo never will.

Book a 15-Minute Review → Back to Edition No. 176 →